As you can see below, the interface is a bit busy and there is no introduction or tutorial splash screen to provide any guidance. General Interface & WorkflowĬorel managed the download and installation process very carefully, so I was a bit surprised to be dropped into the deep end when it came to actually using the software. Please also note that the screenshots below are taken from the Windows version, so if you’re using AfterShot Pro for Mac or Linux the interface will look slightly different. Instead, we’ll look at the most common uses of the program, as well as anything that makes it stand out from the other RAW editors on the market. A Closer Review of Corel AfterShot Pro 3ĪfterShot Pro 3 is a large program, with a number of different features that we don’t have time or space to go into. My training as a graphic designer also included courses on user interface design, which helps me sort the good programs from the bad.ĭisclaimer: Corel provided me with no compensation or free software in exchange for this review, nor have they had any kind of editorial review or input on the content. Over the course of my photographic practice, I’ve experimented with a number of different workflows and image editors, giving me a wide range of insight into just what can be expected from a top-notch program. I trained as a graphic designer while teaching myself photography at the same time, eventually working as a product photographer shooting everything from jewelry to artistic furniture. Hi, my name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve been working with image editing software for over 15 years. The best way to find out is to read this review and then test it for yourself! Why Trust Me for This Review If you’re not interested in doing localized edits, though, AfterShot’s compact one-screen workflow and better initial rendering might be able to convince you to switch programs. Speedy batching is great, but AfterShot’s clumsy localized editing has a long way to go to catch up to Lightroom’s excellent local options. While seems to be faster, there are still some issues that Corel will have to overcome to properly challenge Lightroom. AfterShot Pro uses its own proprietary algorithm to render RAW images, and it almost always produces better results than ACR. Lightroom uses the Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) algorithm to render images, which often come out with narrower tonal ranges and slightly washed-out colors. One of the most interesting differences between Lightroom and AfterShot Pro is the way they render the same RAW images. Front and center on the AfterShot Pro website is a claim that the latest version handles batch editing up to 4 times faster than Lightroom, and you can read the datasheet they published here (PDF). Is Corel AfterShot Pro Better Than Adobe Lightroom?ĪfterShot Pro is Corel’s direct challenge to Adobe Lightroom’s dominance of the RAW editing market, and they aren’t ashamed to admit it. A Closer Review of Corel AfterShot Pro 3.Is Corel AfterShot Pro Better Than Adobe Lightroom?. There's loads of others too, best to try downloading some demos and see what you like. For a complete deal, the Adobe Lightroom Photography plan is hard to beat - yeah it's $/mth, but look at what you get, three full heavy weight apps, cloud syncing, and regular updates and good support. If you want to spend a little, it maybe depends on whether you want a DAM or just an editor. They all have steep learning curves, but can give excellent results once you learn some basics, and they all get updated frequently, and add new cameras quickly. The freely available Open Source solutions are excellent choices if you're looking for low cost - have a look at darktable, RawTherapee and Digikam or GIMP (if you don't need a DAM). Even Photos is worth a go, although beware if you have a large library, it can fall over a lot if pushed too hard. There are plenty of others things that are much better now. I assume you mean DNG, you can convert to that, sometimes it might work, but not always, and not all of the Raw processing data get's converted well - I had a Fuji that converted, but still left very bad lens distortion uncorrected. It was OK back then, but far from the best, probably good value then (I did get mine in a bundle deal), but now it's pretty much useless, IMHO. I bought Aftershot Pro 3 a couple of years ago, and it's been updated very little since - only two minor updates in over 18 months if I recall, and they didn't include new camera support. That's not necessarily a good reason to use it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |